<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joshua Wagner Online &#187; digital</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshuawagneronline.com/tag/digital/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshuawagneronline.com</link>
	<description>On Life, Stories, and Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:47:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Future of Music and the Flat Rate</title>
		<link>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/03/the-future-of-music-and-the-flat-rate/</link>
		<comments>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/03/the-future-of-music-and-the-flat-rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuawagneronline.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This topic has been around for a while now.  We talked about this very problem in a music business class I took in college (only a few years ago, but for digital things, that&#8217;s a while).  Is the music &#8220;flat rate&#8221; the answer for the music industry?
I say no.
Here&#8217;s why.
The flat rate would be essentially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This topic has been around for a while now.  We talked about this very problem in a music business class I took in college (only a few years ago, but for digital things, that&#8217;s a while).  Is the music &#8220;flat rate&#8221; the answer for the music industry?</p>
<p>I say no.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>The flat rate would be essentially a universal internet user tax that would pay for all downloaded music.  That&#8217;s how I understand it.  There&#8217;s probably a thousand different variations, but that&#8217;s the basis.</p>
<p>One big problem is the people who don&#8217;t get their music online.  They subsidize the rest.  Why should I pay for Jonny&#8217;s 183 GB worth of music?  I only have 500 MB!</p>
<p>Another problem I see is that the music industry is essentially capping itself.  If the tax is say $2 per internet user, that only pays for 2 songs per internet connection.  If the average user downloads (or just listens) to more than that per whatever time period we use, then the industry loses money.  As a business model, you want to be paid for what you do.  It&#8217;s bad if you&#8217;re not compensated as much as you should.  If I continued to do that in say, a bakery, then I would go under.</p>
<p>Now, subscription based services seem fine to me, but they&#8217;re especially useful for people who do buy/use a lot of music.  If you&#8217;re going to buy 12 issues per year of some magazine, why not buy a subscription for the year and save some money?  But for the person who only buys 1 or 2 copies over the year, the subscription isn&#8217;t worth it.  They&#8217;ll pay less because they skipped the subcription.</p>
<p>By collecting the music fee, you take away that option for higher usage, and essentially make everyone pay a subscription fee.  It&#8217;s like charging someone $20 to walk in a record store saying &#8220;Take what you want.&#8221;  If you heard that, you&#8217;d go a pick out 20 or 30 CDs.  At $15 per CD, the store just lost money!</p>
<p>And the silly thing is, the music industry has been giving away free songs for years.  It&#8217;s called radio.  In fact, they&#8217;ve paid people to play music on the radio!  Now you&#8217;re telling me that they can&#8217;t figure out a way to monetize digital music other than by universally charging internet users?</p>
<p>Personally, I think things like <a title="Spotify" href="http://www.spotify.com/" target="_blank">Spotify</a> or <a title="Pandora" href="http://www.pandora.com/" target="_blank">Pandora</a> or <a title="YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com/" target="_blank">YouTube</a> are on the right track.  Free music is the ultimate end of the digital revolution.  It&#8217;s too easy to copy songs digitally and give them away for anyone to truly stop it now.  YouTube is like radio MTV.  Pandora is internet radio.  Spotify is more like a new breed of music, combining social media aspects with radio.  The trick is finding ways to <a title="The Value of Real" href="http://www.joshuawagneronline.com/2009/01/value-of-real.html" target="_blank">create value in free music</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have an easy answer.  But I do know that by giving enough away for free, you generate interest that will probably lead to sales.  Charging a flat rate seems to be reaching to far, and I think there has to be a better way.</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;"><a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via web</a> from <a href="http://jbwagner.posterous.com/the-future-of-music-and-the-flat-rate">On Life, Stories, and Music</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/03/the-future-of-music-and-the-flat-rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3975</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Way We&#8217;ve Always Done It: Words Not to Live By</title>
		<link>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/02/the-way-weve-always-done-it-words-not-to-live-by/</link>
		<comments>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/02/the-way-weve-always-done-it-words-not-to-live-by/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuawagneronline.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here&#8217;s the deal.&#160; If, in order to explain why you&#8217;re doing something, you say &#8220;Because that&#8217;s the way we&#8217;ve always done it,&#8221; then you are in trouble.
Case in point: the music industry.&#160; We&#8217;ve always sold physical copies and been able to control their copying to our liking.&#160; That&#8217;s how we&#8217;ll approach digital transmissions.&#160; Result: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here&#8217;s the deal.&nbsp; If, in order to explain why you&#8217;re doing something, you say &#8220;Because that&#8217;s the way we&#8217;ve always done it,&#8221; then you are in trouble.</p>
<p>Case in point: the music industry.&nbsp; We&#8217;ve always sold physical copies and been able to control their copying to our liking.&nbsp; That&#8217;s how we&#8217;ll approach digital transmissions.&nbsp; Result: RIAA as attack dog, proper digital legislation is not around, and the consumers are leaving.</p>
<p>Case in point: the church.&nbsp; We&#8217;ve always done service this way, with these songs, at these times.&nbsp; Why change to anything else?&nbsp; Result: churches are losing members and not reaching out to a new generation of believers.</p>
<p>Obviously there is more to both of the points above, and I&#8217;m really, really oversimplifying things.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the point: <strong>If we are to survive in a new age, we need to reevaluate our methods</strong>.</p>
<p>This is, again, not to say that old methods are bad.&nbsp; I don&#8217;t believe physical copies of music will ever truly dissappear.&nbsp; There will always be some people (probably like me) who like to have a CD, an album, a whatever of their favorite band.&nbsp; And churches have always (I think) sung songs together as a group.&nbsp; They probably always will.&nbsp; But in order to survive and remain viable, we must always reevaluate the methods to see if they are still optimal.&nbsp; If you find that your current methods are falling behind, <strong>then you must adapt.&nbsp; There is no other option.</strong>&nbsp; Your choices are change and grow, or remain and die.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Changing your methods can be hard.&nbsp; If it wasn&#8217;t, we&#8217;d all be doing it constantly.&nbsp; But we cannot end up looking back saying &#8220;If only we had changed.&#8221;&nbsp; If we do, we&#8217;ll end up trying to sell papers to people who don&#8217;t need them anymore because they get the news online.&nbsp; Or on their iPhone or BlackBerry.&nbsp; Or on the next cool toy.&nbsp; If you do successfully change (especially before the rest), you will be prepared for the future.</p>
<p>Just watch out for the next big shift, so you don&#8217;t get caught behind the rest!</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via web</a>   from <a href="http://jbwagner.posterous.com/the-way-weve-always-done-it-wo">On Life, Stories, and Music</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/02/the-way-weve-always-done-it-words-not-to-live-by/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Real</title>
		<link>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/01/the-value-of-real/</link>
		<comments>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/01/the-value-of-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[create]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuawagneronline.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Here we are in a virtual world.&#160; Digital music, virtual games, ebooks, online dating.&#160; Pandora&#8217;s Box is opened, and we can never go back on the digital world.&#160; Not that we want to.&#160; However, as evidenced in declining music and book sales, the value of a real product is diminishing.&#160; It&#8217;s too easy to find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>Here we are in a virtual world.&nbsp; Digital music, virtual games, ebooks, online dating.&nbsp; Pandora&#8217;s Box is opened, and we can never go back on the digital world.&nbsp; Not that we want to.&nbsp; However, as evidenced in declining music and book sales, the value of a real product is diminishing.&nbsp; It&#8217;s too easy to find free products online that compete with going to a brick and mortar store (or even buying through online stores).&nbsp; So how does one create value?&nbsp; Here&#8217;s one idea.</p>
<p>Catching up on eveything, I stumbled across <a title="Back to the Future: Vinyl record sales double in '08, CDs down" href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;taxonomyName=Storage&amp;articleId=9124699&amp;taxonomyId=19&amp;pageNumber=1" target="_blank">this article</a> about vinyl record sales increasing.&nbsp; I chuckled to myself, then I read this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;They [13 to 24 year olds] were brought up on virtual everything. Their games were on the computer or on the TV. Their music was in a box,&#8221; he [Steven Sheldon] said. &#8220;I think they also do recognize the difference in sound, but I think holding that 12-by-12 piece of art and holding that record in their hand is creating the buzz.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The light went on in my head, again.</p>
<p>To add value to your product in a digital age, you need to add something real.&nbsp; Something intangible and scarce.&nbsp; That is what people want to have.</p>
<p>As music inches closer to becoming free, we all need to add something to the experience.&nbsp; Watching your favorite band live is an irreplacable experience.&nbsp; That night will never happen again, and you were a part of the history of the band.&nbsp; Being a part of an exclusive fan club for your favorite artist is another experience.&nbsp; As a member, you can be up to date on inside information.&nbsp; The artist communicates with this group in a special way.&nbsp; You have access to special products and/or offers that others do not.</p>
<p>This is the new music business.&nbsp; Finding ways to connect with others.&nbsp; Finding something to give your consumers something that no one else can.&nbsp; Consumers today can see through the ads.&nbsp; &#8220;Look at this, it&#8217;s the best ever!&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work anymore.&nbsp; Why is it the best?&nbsp; The best for whom?&nbsp; How does it compare to alternatives?&nbsp; If you can offer something that is real and authentic, then the right people will find you.&nbsp; That is why vinyl records are selling again.&nbsp; Most consumers don&#8217;t have them.&nbsp; They create some exclusivity to your brand.&nbsp; This is what you want.</p>
<p>Find a way for your brand to add real value.&nbsp; You just might come up with something big.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via web</a>   from <a href="http://jbwagner.posterous.com/the-value-of-real">On Life, Stories, and Music</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://joshuawagneronline.com/2009/01/the-value-of-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
